18650 lithium battery

　　New energy vehicle subsidies should focus on stimulating technology research and development

　　Due to various reasons, especially technical deficiencies, today, a considerable number of new energy vehicle manufacturers are barely supported by subsidies. Once all subsidies are cancelled, the survival of these enterprises will be in question. Therefore, the issue of whether subsidies will be "retired" is not only strongly discussed by enterprises, but also widely discussed by the market and consumers.

　　The fact is that when technology is not enough to fully support enterprises to absorb the huge pressure after the "reduction" of subsidies, and environmental protection and other requirements require enterprises to develop new energy vehicles, government subsidies should continue to "support the horse and give it away for a while."

　　Although this kind of "gift" will have many disadvantages, for example, some companies that should exit without core technology and competitiveness will continue to make money. However, if all subsidies are rashly cancelled, it will indeed have a relatively large psychological impact on new energy vehicle manufacturers, and will cause those companies that really invest heavily in technology and R&D to give up or reduce their investment in technology and R&D. Obviously, this is the most undesirable phenomenon.

　　Because of this, subsidies for new energy vehicles, which have already withdrawn a large part, need to be stabilized and stopped, and should not be withdrawn significantly or even completely. Otherwise, many new problems and contradictions will arise, which will even seriously affect the enthusiasm of enterprises to produce new energy vehicles.

　　What needs to be grasped is that not withdrawing from the subsidy policy for the time being does not mean that the current subsidy method should be continued. Because, the reason why we need to withdraw subsidies for new energy vehicles is that the time has come and policy adjustments are needed.

　　A very important reason is that the subsidy policy for new energy vehicles has not fully played its role in promoting the development of new energy vehicles. Because, for quite some time in the past, as long as it was branded as a new energy vehicle, it could receive subsidies. As a result, many companies have gone for subsidies instead of new energy vehicles, and even cheated on subsidies.

　　This also means that the subsidy policy for new energy vehicles must be adjusted and optimized while gradually withdrawing, so that the subsidy policy can work better. Among them, encouraging enterprises to strengthen technology research and development and enhance the core competitiveness of products is the most important aspect.

　　Judging from the actual situation, there are not many current new energy vehicle manufacturers with high technical levels and R&D capabilities, and even fewer have core technologies that are at the world's leading level. Under such circumstances, if government subsidies cannot better promote and stimulate corporate technology research and development, it will be quite difficult to enhance the market competitiveness of new energy vehicle manufacturers.

　　For example, one of the core components of new energy vehicles is the battery. If the battery problem is solved, the competitiveness of new energy vehicles will naturally increase. On the contrary, if the battery problem is not solved well, other aspects will be in vain. Therefore, while the subsidy policy is temporarily retained, the subsidies can be focused on supporting and supporting core components and core products such as batteries, so as to avoid subsidies that are always "sprinkling water all over the sky" and cannot always play their best role.

　　The subsidy policy for new energy vehicles can not be withdrawn for the time being, which is very important for the development of the new energy vehicle industry. However, since so much money is spent to subsidize new energy vehicles, it must be used cautiously, scientifically, and rationally, and the subsidy must be focused on the research and development of core technologies instead of "sprinkling water all over the sky."

Read recommendations:

Lithium Battery GN60120

Which has a longer lifespan, lithium batteries or polymer lithium batteries?3.7V Lithium Polymer Bat

CCS certification standards for lithium batteries for electric ships

48v lithium battery pack

cr2032 button battery