6LR61 battery

Mainstream of new energy vehicles - ternary 6LR61 battery

In recent years, my country's new energy vehicle industry has been forging ahead under the dual benefits of policies and markets, and power batteries as its core components have also received increasing market attention. As we all know, the core technology of new energy vehicles is "three electricity", namely battery, electronic control, and motor. As one of the three core components of electric vehicles, batteries bear the heavy responsibility of electric vehicle range, and lithium iron phosphate and ternary lithium batteries are the mainstream choices of power batteries in my country.

However, with the advancement of research and development technology, ternary lithium batteries have exploded with greater potential. Among the 8 batches of 296 new energy passenger cars announced by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology in 2017, ternary lithium is the most used, with a total of 221 models, and only 33 models use lithium iron phosphate.

Since the beginning of last year, BYD, which has been using lithium iron phosphate batteries, has launched a number of models equipped with ternary lithium batteries, such as Song EV300, Qin 80 and Tang 100, contrary to its usual practice. In October this year, BYD officially announced that in the future, in addition to continuing to use lithium iron phosphate batteries in the public transportation field, all PHEV passenger cars of the company will use ternary lithium batteries; next year, pure electric vehicles such as E5, E6, and Qin EV will also switch to ternary lithium batteries.

So, which is better, lithium iron phosphate or ternary 6LR61 battery? In fact, the issue that consumers care about is nothing more than: which battery has a longer range, longer life, and is safer. Let's analyze these issues one by one.

Energy density (range) comparison

Compared with the energy density of lithium iron phosphate batteries, ternary lithium batteries have a higher energy density and a higher voltage, so the battery capacity of the same weight of battery pack is larger, and the car can run farther. In addition, higher energy density can free up more body space, which is a plus for home users.

At present, the large number of ternary 6LR61 battery production lines launched in China is also closely related to subsidy policies. According to the circulated subsidy adjustment plan for new energy passenger vehicles, in 2018, the battery system energy density must reach 140Wh/kg to enjoy 1.1 times the subsidy, while the subsidy adjustment coefficient for low energy density (105-120Wh/kg) has dropped to 0.5, and the gap between high-end and low-end subsidies has further widened, and car companies will undoubtedly pursue the former more.

The energy density of lithium iron phosphate battery monomers is usually between 90-120Wh/kg, while the energy density of ternary 6LR61 battery monomers can reach about 200Wh/kg. As a global leader in automotive lithium batteries, CATL plans to develop ternary lithium batteries with an energy density of 300-350Wh/kg before 2020, and the cruising range will have a qualitative leap by then. On the contrary, lithium iron phosphate batteries have reached a bottleneck in the research and development of energy density, which has directly led to some car companies giving up on lithium iron phosphate batteries.

Charging efficiency comparison

Ternary lithium has obvious advantages over lithium iron phosphate in terms of charging efficiency. When the ternary 6LR61 battery and the lithium iron phosphate battery are charged below 10C, there is no obvious difference in the constant current ratio. When the charging rate is above 10C, the constant current ratio of the lithium iron phosphate battery decreases rapidly, and the charging efficiency decreases rapidly. For new energy vehicles, a more efficient charging time can significantly improve the car experience. After all, it is quite helpless to wait for the car to be fully charged before going on the road.

Service life comparison

In terms of service life, lithium iron phosphate has an advantage over ternary lithium in terms of recycling rate, but for ordinary families, the rated cycle life of both far exceeds the actual use. In addition, the low-temperature performance attenuation of lithium iron phosphate batteries is a major defect. Studies have shown that if a battery with a capacity of 3500mAh works in an environment of -10℃, after less than 100 charge and discharge cycles, the power will decay sharply to 500mAh. As the main market for pure electric vehicles, the temperature in Beijing is often around minus 16℃ in winter, which will cause great trouble to car owners.

Safety comparison

In terms of material system, both batteries will decompose when reaching a certain temperature. The decomposition temperature of lithium iron phosphate battery is higher than that of ternary 6LR61 battery, but this does not mean that the safety of ternary 6LR61 battery is poor. After all, the safety design of power battery system can be improved through power connection structure, thermal management design, battery management system and other aspects. By making the safety measures more perfect and scientific, the battery can work in a safe state. For example, the ITCS battery temperature management system equipped in Geely New Energy's electric vehicles can start cooling at 38°C to ensure that the battery operates in a safe temperature range.

Through the above analysis, it is not difficult to find that although lithium iron phosphate battery is slightly better in high temperature resistance and cycle life, ternary 6LR61 battery has obvious advantages in energy density, cruising range, low temperature performance and charging efficiency, and shows greater development possibilities.

Read recommendations:

801538 480mAh 3.7V

Power battery cost accounts for half of the cost of new energy vehicles.energy storage battery home

Research on sintering matching of crystalline silicon solar cells

convenient energy storage power supply price

LR1121 battery